Friday, July 5, 2013

Split Pots in Texas Hold’em

$25 free NO Deposit & %200 FIRST DEPOSIT BONUS! 13 Years online! SLOTLAND casino. $100,000+ progressive JackPots!
USE this LINK
I'VE received many e-mails asking me to make your mind up the winning hand in Texas Hold’em. Since several readers have asked the similar question about split pots, I BELIEVED I'D answer my latest question the following article. Peter wrote:

The Question I have a matter for you a couple of tiebreaker in Texas Hold 'em. It's with regard to a tiebreaker. On this situation, two players are left. The 5 communal cards are a 2, 3, 4, 5 and six of mixed suits. Player One has a three and a 4. Player Two has a King and a Queen. Obviously, the most efficient hand is the straight at the board. My question is who wins? I'm assuming there are 3 possible answers:

1. Player One wins because he has 2 pair, and Player Two only has King high. I DO NOT BELIEVE that is right, because Player Two's best hand (the straight at the board,) is best than the two pair.

2. Player Two wins because he has the upper kicker (the King beating the 4.) I BELIEVE if there's a winner, it is because of this.

3. The hand is a draw and the two players split the pot.

The Answer The correct answer is number 3. This can be a split pot. In Texas Hold’em the winning hand is the top five card hand. It may be constituted of any combination of the 2 personal cards held by the players and the five community cards. Sometimes the top five card hand is made through the use of the five community cards as in our example above. A sixth or seventh card is rarely used to wreck a tie.

In this case if there has been a 3rd or fourth player still active within the hand they usually didn't have a hand that would beat the straight at the board, then the pot can be split amongst all of the active players.

Watch out for the Raise Sometimes when it seems that the most productive hand is at the board a player will raise in hopes that probably the most other players will fold. Then they may be able to win the pot our right or reduce at the selection of players splitting the pot. For instance:

The board cards are: King diamonds – Queen spades - Jack hearts - Ten clubs – 9 hearts

The best hand that may be made is the Ace high straight. One of the crucial players may bet or raise to check out and make you think that they have got an Ace for a better straight. Consequently you're forced to name the bet incase this can be a bluff. The worst that may happen when you call is that you simply lose a big gamble. For those who fold and there's a spit pot you've gotten cost yourself a component to the pot.

When Kickers Play Situations will arise when there's a winning hand similar to a flush at the board. If two or more active players have a suited card higher than the bottom card at the board then the player with the upper card will win. As an example:

The board cards are: Ace spades - King spades – Ten spades – 9 spades – 6 spades

Player One has Queen spades and Jack hearts. Player Two has 8 spades and seven hearts. Player 1 wins because their Queen of spades makes the next flush than the player with the 8 of spades.

There would however be a split pot if both players had a spade that was less than the 6 spades. As an example if Player One had the 5 of spades and Player Two had the three of spades then the 6 at the board makes the next flush than either of the players could make with their cards.

There you've got it. Now you understand how to figure out a split pot. Just remember the fact that only five cards can be utilized to make the most efficient hand. In the event that they happen to be the five community cards at the board, then this is a split pot and can be divided by all of the players still active within the hand.

Until Next time remember: Luck comes and goes.....Knowledge Stays Forever.


$25 free NO Deposit & %200 FIRST DEPOSIT BONUS! 13 Years online! SLOTLAND casino. $100,000+ progressive JackPots!
USE this LINK

USE this LINK

Read More... [Source: About.com Casino Gambling: What's Hot Now]

No comments: